<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO isn&#8217;t rocket science but neither is rocket science according to NASA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/</link>
	<description>SEM Scholar</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: semcertification</title>
		<link>http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>semcertification</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kelvin it was getting a bit too serious.  I also do both and learn a lot from each camp. 

Actually Chris, Jeremy over at Search Engine Lowdown claims that seo is brain surgery so since seo is not rocket science and seo is brain surgery then brain surgery must not be rocket science either. Nice try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kelvin it was getting a bit too serious.  I also do both and learn a lot from each camp. </p>
<p>Actually Chris, Jeremy over at Search Engine Lowdown claims that seo is brain surgery so since seo is not rocket science and seo is brain surgery then brain surgery must not be rocket science either. Nice try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Winfield</title>
		<link>http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Winfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>So what is actually "rocket science" then? Brain surgery? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is actually &#8220;rocket science&#8221; then? Brain surgery? <img src='http://www.semscholar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvin newman</title>
		<link>http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvin newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semscholar.com/2007/01/12/seo-isnt-rocket-science-but-neither-is-rocket-science-according-to-nasa/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>At last some humour in the whole debate. Maybe its because I have a foot in both the PPC and SEO camps but I can't really understand why the camps are so at odd. I would have thought both were slightly different techniques which can work together to achieve their aim, traffic.

Some people take stuff to seriously good to see some people can have a laugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last some humour in the whole debate. Maybe its because I have a foot in both the PPC and SEO camps but I can&#8217;t really understand why the camps are so at odd. I would have thought both were slightly different techniques which can work together to achieve their aim, traffic.</p>
<p>Some people take stuff to seriously good to see some people can have a laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
